A print friendly PDF version is available from this Communicable Diseases Intelligence issue's table of contents.
Martyn Kirk for the OzFoodNet Working Group
Introduction
In the latter part of 2000 the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care established and funded a collaborative network - coined OzFoodNet - to enhance the existing surveillance mechanisms for foodborne disease across Australia.The aims of OzFoodNet are to:
- estimate the incidence of foodborne disease in Australia;
- learn more about the causes and determinants of foodborne disease;
- identify risky practices associated with food handling and preparation; and
- train foodborne disease epidemiologists.
State health authorities have employed epidemiologists to enhance foodborne disease surveillance and conduct applied research into foodborne disease. Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, Queensland and Victoria are enhancing surveillance across the whole State. New South Wales is concentrating efforts on the Hunter region although comparative data for the rest of the State area were supplied where available.
Notifications in the first quarter 2001
In the first quarter of 2001, Campylobacter was the most commonly notified enteric pathogen, with 3056 cases reported to all OzFoodNet sites, except New South Wales, where campylobacteriosis is not a notifiable disease. Despite the large number of cases, there was only one cluster investigated in OzFoodNet sites for the period.OzFoodNet sites reported 2115 cases of salmonellosis (529 from New South Wales) and 10 outbreaks. Notifications of salmonellosis for the first quarter of 2001 were increased in the Tasmania (19.0%), and in the Hunter Public Health Unit (Hunter PHU) (15.8%), when compared with the three-year mean for the same quarter for 1998-2000. Although there was also a 37.7 per cent increase in Western Australia, this reflected a change in the notifications system there, whereby laboratory notifications were counted for the first time only from the beginning of 2000. Notifications of Salmonella infections from the States of South Australia (-53.4%), Queensland (-18.8%), Victoria (-12.0%), and New South Wales (-9.5%) were decreased compared to three-year mean values† (Figure).
Figure. Notifications of Salmonella infections to OzFoodNet sites, January 1998 to March 2001, by date of onset
Salmonella Typhimurium Phage Type 135 was one of the most common serovars in OzFoodNet sites (Table 1). It was represented in the top 5 serovars of all sites, except for Tasmania. Some States distinguished Typhimurium 135 into variant 135a, although reference laboratories are currently clarifying the sub-typing of this serovar. In Tasmania, the predominant serovar reported during the quarter was S. Mississippi (56/71 cases) - a serovar endemic to this State. The incidence of S. Mississippi in Tasmania was similar to previous years and there was no obvious geographical clustering. Data on Salmonella serovars were not available for samples from Western Australia at the time of writing this report.
Top of pageTable 1. Top five serovar of Salmonella notified to OzFoodNet sites, January to March 2001, by date of onset
State |
First quarter 2000 | Second quarter 2000 | Total 2000 | % change | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New South Wales | Typhimurium 135 | 52 |
28 |
121 |
85.7 |
Typhimurium 135a | 28 |
3 |
13 |
833.3 |
|
Typhimurium 9 | 38 |
44 |
136 |
-13.6 |
|
Typhimurium 64 | 31 |
33 |
76 |
-6.1 |
|
Birkenhead | 26 |
23 |
76 |
13.0 |
|
Hunter PHU | Typhimurium 135a | 7 |
0 |
0 |
|
Typhimurium 135 | 5 |
2 |
10 |
150.0 |
|
Typhimurium 64 | 3 |
5 |
13 |
-40.0 |
|
Typhimurium 9 | 3 |
2 |
3 |
50.0 |
|
Typhimurium 44 | 2 |
0 |
0 |
||
Queensland | Birkenhead | 62 |
35 |
97 |
77.1 |
Saintpaul | 61 |
44 |
185 |
38.6 |
|
Virchow 8 | 48 |
66 |
175 |
-27.3 |
|
Typhimurium 135 | 42 |
57 |
127 |
-26.3 |
|
Aberdeen | 27 |
25 |
58 |
8.0 |
|
South Australia | Typhimurium 9 | 19 |
8 |
28 |
137.5 |
Typhimurium 135 | 19 |
1 |
3 |
1800.0 |
|
Typhimurium 126 | 15 |
0 |
4 |
||
Typhimurium 64 | 13 |
4 |
20 |
225.0 |
|
Chester | 9 |
6 |
18 |
50.0 |
|
Tasmania | Mississippi | 56 |
36 |
73 |
55.6 |
Typhimurium 9 | 3 |
7 |
22 |
-57.1 |
|
Bovismorbificans | 1 |
0 |
1 |
||
Enteriditis 1 | 1 |
1 |
1 |
0.0 |
|
Muenchen | 1 |
0 |
0 |
||
Victoria1 | Typhimurium 9 | 51 |
58 |
178 |
-12.1 |
Typhimurium 135 | 43 |
23 |
68 |
87.0 |
|
Typhimurium 4 | 37 |
7 |
38 |
428.6 |
|
Virchow 34 | 16 |
37 |
60 |
-56.8 |
|
Typhimurium 170 | 15 |
9 |
36 |
66.7 |
1. Victorian data reported by date of receipt at the Victorian Department of Human Services.
OzFoodNet sites reported 22 cases of listeriosis with reported onset of symptoms in the first quarter of 2001. The highest number of cases was reported from Queensland (8 cases), followed by Victoria (6 cases), and New South Wales (5 cases). The majority of these cases were reported in older males who were immunocompromised. The median age of cases varied between 63 and 83 years. None of the cases in Queensland involved maternal-foetal infections.
South Australia recorded 77.3 per cent (17/22) of cases of Shiga toxin producing E. Coli (STEC) from OzFoodNet sites during the first quarter of 2001. The median age of these South Australian cases was 32.5 years (range 0-87 years), and the male to female ratio was 1:1. South Australian pathology laboratories intensively screen faeces containing blood for the presence of a gene that encodes for production of shiga toxin. Other States do not conduct similar intensive screening, and detecting toxin producing E. coli requires special culture media or the use of nucleic acid detection methods. These factors account for the relatively higher number of reports from South Australia.
The only other OzFoodNet sites to report STEC cases were Victoria (3 cases), and Queensland (2 cases). Despite the high number of cases reported from South Australia relative to other States, the total number reported in South Australia was decreased in the first quarter of 2001 compared to previous years.
There were 3 reports of haemolytic uraemic syndrome during the first quarter of 2001. Two of these were from Queensland and one was from Victoria. E. coli O111 was identified in one of these cases, but no toxigenic E. coli were isolated from the other 2 cases.
Top of page
Foodborne disease outbreaks
During the quarter, OzFoodNet sites reported 27 outbreaks that were potentially related to food. These outbreaks affected approximately 402 people and a total of 28 people were hospitalised (Table 2). Some of these outbreaks were associated with previously recognised high-risk foods or food preparations and should have been preventable. An example of this was a small family cluster of rudderfish diarrhoea that occurred in the Hunter area of New South Wales. Similar outbreaks of rudderfish diarrhoea have previously occurred in Victoria and South Australia.Table 2. Outbreaks reported by OzFoodNet sites, first quarter 2001
State |
Month |
Setting |
Agent responsible |
No. exposed |
No. affected |
Responsible vehicles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vic | Jan | Function | S. Typhimurium 170 | 30 | 14 | Beef product suspected |
Jan | Restaurant | Norwalk | 12 | 9 | Unknown | |
Feb | Restaurant | Unknown | 9 | 5 | Unknown | |
Feb | Restaurant | Norwalk | 159 | 65 | Possible sausages | |
Feb | Restaurant | Unknown (suspected Norwalk) | 56 | 24 | Unknown | |
Mar | Home | Ciguatera toxin | 17 | 13 | Coral Trout | |
Mar | Hotel | Unknown | 36 | 9 | Possible cheese platter, mushroom risotto, Thai prawns or combination | |
Mar | Restaurant | Unknown | 18 | 14 | Unknown | |
SA | Dec 00- Jan 01 | Restaurant | S. Typhimurium 29 | 8 | Consumption of prepared food at the restaurant | |
Nov 00-Jan 20 | Rotavirus in one faecal specimen | 11 | ||||
Mar | S. Typhimurium 126 | 9 | Custard fruit tart | |||
Jan | S. Typhimurium 185 | 5 | ||||
Mar | Aged care | S. Typhimurium 135 | 38 | 17 | Raw egg (served in mince and potato pie and rice pudding) | |
WA | Mar | Remote mine | S. Typhimurium untyped | ~300 | 29 | Probably bore water supply |
Feb-Mar | Detention centre | S. Wandsworth | ~1000 | 501 | Unknown | |
Tas | Feb | Unknown | 10 | 9 | Unknown | |
Qld | Jan | Home | Ciguatera | 14 | 14 | Spanish mackerel |
Jan | Home | Ciguatera | 2 | 2 | Spotted Mackerel | |
Jan | Restaurant | C. perfringens | 25 | 9 | Reef and Beef (possible sauce) | |
Jan | Camp (health retreat) | Unknown | 141 | 87 | Drinking water | |
Feb | Restaurant | Histamine poisoning | 4 | 4 | Mahi Mahi | |
Feb | Aged care facility | Unknown | Unknown | 19 | Unknown | |
Feb | Wedding | Unknown | 110 | 6 | Unknown | |
Feb | Aged care facility | S. Heidelberg PT 1 | Unknown | 12 | Suspected raw egg drink | |
Mar | Aged care facility | S. Muenchen | Unknown | 3 | Unknown | |
Mar | Caterer | S. Virchow PT 8 | Unknown | 2 | Chicken | |
Mar | Takeaway | C. jejuni | Unknown | 3 | Chicken kebabs |
1. All cases in this outbreak were asymptomatic.
During the quarter, the Queensland OzFoodNet site reported a small cluster of 3 cases of Campylobacter infection that was associated with a chicken kebab shop. This is the third small outbreak of Campylobacter associated with take-away kebab shops in the last 2 years. These infections are easily prevented providing proprietors cook the meat thoroughly, monitor the internal temperature of the meat, and handle foods correctly.
There were 2 outbreaks of salmonellosis associated with raw or undercooked eggs served to residents of aged care facilities during the quarter. One of these outbreaks was due to Salmonella Heidelberg 1 (Queensland), and the other to Salmonella Typhimurium 135 (South Australia). There is a high risk of Salmonella infection associated with the consumption of raw eggs, which should not be served to elderly people.
Top of page
Surveillance improvements and applied research
The work of OzFoodNet during the quarter revealed several areas where surveillance and control activities for foodborne disease need improvement. These have included differences between States in the case definition for listeriosis, and delays in communicating Salmonella typing information. OzFoodNet will work with stakeholders, such as State and Territory health departments, the Communicable Diseases Network Australia (CDNA) and industry groups, to effect improvements.OzFoodNet epidemiologists in each site have developed plans for studies to further our knowledge about foodborne disease in Australia. These studies include:
- a national survey of diarrhoeal prevalence;
- four case control studies into risk factors for infections due to: Campylobacter, Salmonella Enteriditis and other locally-important serovars, Listeria, and STEC;
- a census of pathology laboratories for faecal testing practices;
- a register for foodborne outbreaks;
- laboratory sub-typing projects on Campylobacter;
- a retrospective review of foodborne disease across Australia; and
- enhanced surveillance through laboratories and general practitioners.
OzFoodNet has only recently been established, but has developed into an extensive network of foodborne disease specialists. This has the potential to benefit investigations of foodborne disease that cross State and Territory boundaries. OzFoodNet sites will provide an estimate of the incidence of foodborne disease in Australia, and will work to improve investigation and control efforts.
OzFoodNet represents a significant investment in applied research into foodborne disease. It is important for the results of this work to become incorporated into policy formulation. The results of analytical studies will provide a useful insight into the occurrences of foodborne disease in Australia.
The OzFoodNet Working Group is (in alphabetical order):
Rosie Ashbolt (Tas), Louise Carter (ACT), Meredith Caelli (Hunter PHU), Scott Crerar (ANZFA), Craig Dalton (Hunter PHU), Rod Givney (SA), Joy Gregory (Vic), Gillian Hall (NCEPH), Brigid Hardy (AFFA), Geoff Hogg (MDU), Martyn Kirk (ANZFA), Vanessa Madden (Tas), Ian McKay (DHAC), David Peacock (NT), Nittita Prasopa-Plaizier (Vic), Paul Roche (DHAC), Russell Stafford (Qld), Elenor Sullivan (WA), Nola Tomaska (NCEPH), Tony Watson (WA), Leanne Unicomb (Hunter PHU)Footnotes
* Totals for foodborne disease in this report differ from those reported for the same period to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. This report analysed cases by date of report and included cases with a disease onset date in 2000 and a date of report in the first quarter 2001 unless specified otherwise.† The three-year mean value for South Australia was skewed by the large number of cases in a Salmonella Typhimurium 135a outbreak associated with contaminated orange juice in March 1999.
Author affiliation
Corresponding author: Mr Martyn Kirk, Coordinating Epidemiologist, OzFoodNet, c/o National Public Health Partnership, Level 12, 589 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria, 3000 Telephone +61 3 9616 1522, E-mail Martyn.Kirk@dhs.vic.gov.auThe full membership of the OzFoodNet Working Group is listed above.
This article was published in Communicable Diseases Intelligence Volume 25, No 3, August 2001.
CDI Search
Communicable Diseases Intelligence subscriptions
Sign-up to email updates: Subscribe Now
Communicable Diseases Surveillance
This issue - Vol 25, No 3, August 2001
Communicable Diseases Intelligence