A print friendly PDF version is available from this Communicable Diseases Intelligence issue's table of contents.
Tony Merritt, Barry Combs, Nevada Pingault
Introduction
Campylobacter is a frequent contaminant of poultry liver. The bacteria can often be found throughout liver tissues and may survive brief frying. Two recent microbiological surveys of raw poultry liver in New Zealand identified Campylobacter on the surface of 98% and 100% of livers sampled, and isolated Campylobacter from within liver tissues in 76% and 90% of samples.1,2 Cooking liver to achieve an internal temperature of between 70 and 80 degrees Celsius for at least 2 minutes was required to inactivate Campylobacter.2
The Health Protection Agency in the United Kingdom recently reported a significant increase in Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes in the United Kingdom and attributed this to deliberate undercooking.3,4 The United Kingdom Food Standards Agency issued advice to caterers on the safe handling and cooking of livers in 2010, recommending that livers be cooked thoroughly until steaming hot all the way through, to reach a core temperature of 70 degrees Celsius for 2 minutes or equivalent.5,6 An update in December 2011 recommended that ‘chefs thoroughly cook chicken livers fully to kill any bacteria, until there is no pinkness left in the centre’.7
Australian outbreaks
Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes have not been commonly recognised in Australia but have increased in frequency in recent years.
A review of the OzFoodNet outbreak register identified seven such outbreaks in Australia since 2000, with six of these occurring since 2008 (Table).
Only outbreaks in which a poultry liver food item could be clearly identified are included in this report and it is possible that there were additional associated outbreaks. For example, poultry liver pate may be an ingredient in dishes such as Asian-style pork and chicken rolls. These items have been implicated in Campylobacter outbreaks during this period, but poultry liver pate was not specifically identified as the food vehicle for any of these.
The identification of Campylobacter outbreaks in general is also constrained by the lack of an effective typing system for this pathogen. In addition, Campylobacter is not notifiable in New South Wales.
Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes have occurred in five Australian states since 2000. All outbreaks implicated commercial food venues with either chicken (5) or duck (2) liver dishes prepared on site. The 2 outbreaks reported in Tasmania involved functions at the same venue serving the same menu 2 days apart. A relative risk for the combined cohort is provided in the Table.
Table: Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes, Australia, 2000 to 2011
Year |
State |
Cases | Setting |
Suspected food vehicle |
Epidemiological investigation |
Environmental investigation |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Confirmed* | RR/OR (95% CI)† |
|||||
2001 | Qld | 2 |
2 |
Restaurant | Pan-fried duck liver | Under-cooked duck liver reported | |
2008 | Qld | 4 |
2 |
Restaurant | Chicken liver pâté | 4/6 diners ate pâté, all 4 developed gastroenteritis | No food samples collected |
2009 | Tas | 35 |
7 |
Restaurant | Chicken liver parfait | Combined cohort RR 5.2 (2.4–11.3) |
Inadequate cooking of livers suspected. Livers lightly pan-fried, leaving pink centres. Parfait samples negative for Campylobacter. |
2009 | Tas | 9 |
0 |
Restaurant | |||
2010 | SA | 9 |
1 |
Restaurant | Chicken liver pâté/steak | RR 6.7 (1.7–26.3) | Cooking procedure not described in detail. Food samples negative, pâté not sampled. |
2011 | NSW | 11 |
2 |
Restaurant | Chicken liver pâté | RR 6.9 (1.0–45.4) | Cooked whole until liver surface was brown, liver temperature not monitored. Pâté from a subsequent batch negative for Campylobacter and Salmonella. |
2011 | WA | 67 |
6 |
Function centre | Duck liver parfait | OR 13.0 (1.9–91.5) | Parfait made from duck liver. Oven baked to core temperature of 60°C. Raw duck liver from a subsequent batch positive for Campylobacter. |
* Confirmed Campylobacter infection.
† RR: Relative risk, OR: Odds ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
A poultry liver dish was implicated by an analytic epidemiological investigation for 5 outbreaks and the descriptive epidemiology was supportive for the other two. The liver dishes were often consumed or discarded prior to an investigation and Campylobacter was not identified in samples of the implicated food item for any outbreak. In the 2011 outbreak in Western Australia, Campylobacter was isolated from a subsequent batch of raw duck liver from the same supplier.
Inadequate cooking of poultry liver dishes was likely a significant contributing factor to these outbreaks. Temperature monitoring was only described for one venue (Western Australia 2011) and the cooking times and temperatures were inadequate to achieve a core temperature sufficient to inactivate Campylobacter reliably. Inadequate cooking was suspected by investigators for a further 4 outbreaks and cooking details were not available for the remaining two.
Conclusion
A recent increase in Campylobacter outbreaks associated with poultry liver dishes in Australia and the United Kingdom has highlighted potential foodborne illness risks if these dishes are undercooked.
There is a need to develop and promote Australian guidelines for the safe preparation of poultry liver dishes.
Acknowledgement
We thank the OzFoodNet Working Group for providing outbreak data.
Author details
Tony Merritt, Public Health Physician1
Barry Combs, OzFoodNet Epidemiologist2
Nevada Pingault, OzFoodNet Epidemiologist2
1. Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales
2. Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia
Corresponding author: Dr Tony Merritt, Public Health Physician, Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, LMB 10, WALLSEND NSW 2287. Telephone: +61 2 4924 6477. Facsimile: +61 2 4924 6048. Email tony.merritt@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au
References
1. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Bacterial concentrations of poultry offal and in mechanically separated meat products at the processing plant. MAF technical paper No: 2011/59. May 2011. Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/bacterial-concentrations-of-poultry-offal.pdf
2. Whyte R, Hudson J, Graham C. Campylobacter in chicken liver and their destruction by pan-frying. Lett Appl Microbiol 2006;43(6):591–595.
3. Health Protection Agency. Foodborne outbreaks of campylobacter associated with consumption of poultry liver pâté/parfait – spotlight on caterers and food safety. Health Protection Report 2010;4(48). News. Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/hpr/archives/2010/news4810.htm
4. Health Protection Agency. How to spoil a wedding – foodborne campylobacter outbreaks at catering premises and catered events. Health Protection Report 2011; 5(48). Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.hpa.org.uk/hpr/archives/2011/hpr4811.pdf
5. Food Standards Agency. Caterers warned on chicken livers. 28 July 2010. London: FSA, 2010. Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2010/jul/livers
6. Food Standards Agency. FSA reminds caterers about safe preparation of chicken livers. 3 December 2010. London: FSA, 2010. Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2010/dec/liver
7. Food Standards Agency. Food poisoning risk from chicken liver pate. 2 December 2011. London: FSA, 2011. Accessed on 21 December 2011. Available from: http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2011/dec/campypate
CDI Search
Communicable Diseases Intelligence subscriptions
Sign-up to email updates: Subscribe Now
Communicable Diseases Surveillance
This issue - Vol 35 No 4, December 2011
Communicable Diseases Intelligence