Communicable Diseases Network Australia National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee annual report, 2006-07

This report describes the epidemiology of mosquito-borne disease in Australia for the mosquito-borne disease season 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. It also includes data on the Sentinel Chicken Surveillance Scheme, which aims to provide early warning of the presence of mosquito-borne disease.

Page last updated: 20 March 2008

A print friendly PDF version is available from this Communicable Diseases Intelligence issue's table of contents.

Introduction | Methods | Results | Acknowledgements | References | Appendix

Conan Liu, Kylie Begg, Cheryl Johansen, Peter Whelan, Nina Kurucz, Lorna Melville, and the National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee

Abstract

This report describes the epidemiology of mosquito-borne disease in Australia for the mosquito-borne disease season 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, which was moderately low compared to previous seasons. Ross River virus (RRV) infections (55%), Barmah Forest virus (BFV) infections (29%) and overseas acquired malaria (11%) were the most common mosquito-borne diseases reported in 2006–07. The number, proportion and rate of national BFV notifications were the second highest on record since 1998–99. The Northern Territory reported the highest BFV notification rate this season. BFV notification rates were the highest in the 40–59 year age groups when compared to other age groups. The number, proportion and rate of RRV notifications were moderately low this season compared with previous seasons. The highest RRV rate was reported by Western Australia from the Kimberley region. The highest age-specific RRV notification rate was observed in the 40–59 year age groups. Locally acquired dengue virus notifications were low this season compared to previous seasons, with a small outbreak of dengue serotype 3 in 39 cases confined to the greater Townsville region. There were 640 notifications of malaria in 2006–07 of which none were reported as locally acquired. This was the third highest number of malaria notifications since 2001. Plasmodium falciparum was reported as the infecting species in 47% of the malaria notifications and Plasmodium vivax for 40% of cases. Young adolescents and adults in the 15–29 year age group had the highest number of cases accounting for 32% of notifications. Sentinel chicken surveillance data for flaviviruses and sentinel pig surveillance data for Japanese encephalitis virus are also reported. Commun Dis Intell 2008;32:31–47.

Top of page

Introduction

This report describes the epidemiology of nationally notifiable mosquito-borne disease in Australia for the season 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.

The eight notifiable mosquito-borne diseases under national surveillance include the alphaviruses (Barmah Forest virus and Ross River virus), the flaviviruses (dengue, Japanese encephalitis, Kunjin, Murray Valley encephalitis and flavivirus not elsewhere classified), and malaria.

Alphaviruses are ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses which cause disease epidemics characterised by fever, rash and polyarthritis. In Australia, Barmah Forest virus (BFV) infection and Ross River virus (RRV) infection are the alphaviruses of major public health significance. There are a variety of mosquito vectors which facilitate the transmission of these viruses in diverse environments (freshwater habitats, coastal regions, salt marshes, floodwaters, established wetlands and urban areas).1,2 At this time, the alphavirus chikungunya virus has not become established in Australia despite its increased activity in southern Asia and the Indian Ocean over the past year, and its occasional diagnosis in returning travellers.

Flaviviruses are single-stranded RNA viruses, some of which are associated with epidemic encephalitis in various regions of the world. In Australia, the flaviviruses of public health importance are the dengue viruses (DENV) with frequent seasonal outbreaks,3–6 Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) with occasional outbreaks,7–12 and sporadic cases of Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV) or Kunjin virus (KUNV) infections.13 The International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses refers to Kunjin as a strain of West Nile virus (WNV)14 and the Australian Kunjin strains are phylogenetically located in the WNV lineage 1, clade B.15

Malaria is caused by infection with a protozoan blood parasite from the genus Plasmodium that has been transmitted by a species of mosquito from the genus Anopheles. Malaria was eradicated from Australia in 1981 and Australia was certified malaria-free by the World Health Organization in 1983,16 but the region of northern Australia above 19°S latitude in particular, remains receptive to malaria transmission. Since 1981, malaria acquired in Australia has been rare, but there have been several documented reports of outbreaks17,18 and sporadic locally acquired cases in Queensland,19,20 malaria acquired in the Torres Strait,21 and the artificial induction of malaria by blood transfusion.22

Top of page

Methods

Eight nationally notifiable mosquito-borne diseases were analysed for the seasonal period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. Historical data from 2001, and in some cases from 1991, are also included for comparison. Data were extracted by diagnosis date from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) on 21 September 2007 and finalised with state and territory public health surveillance managers.

Epidemic curves by state or territory were produced for each of the eight diseases. Notifiable mosquito-borne disease activity is shown compared with a five-year mean for the same period, by jurisdiction. The rolling monthly mean was calculated for the mosquito-borne disease activity for the equivalent month over five years. The number of notifications and annual or annualised notification rates for locally acquired mosquito-borne disease were calculated using the December 2006 population estimates from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), for each year. Age– and sex-specific notification rates were calculated using age and sex population estimates for each jurisdiction.

A survey was conducted with state and territory surveillance managers and public health laboratories about imported cases of chikungunya virus infections during 2006–2007.

The geographical distribution of selected diseases was mapped using ArcGIS (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA). Maps were based on the postcode of residence of each notification aggregated to the appropriate Statistical Division, and rates were calculated using the number of notifications (numerator) divided by the estimated 2006 ABS populations for each division (denominator).

Sentinel chicken surveillance data for flaviviruses and sentinel pig surveillance data for Japanese encephalitis virus are reported.

Top of page

Results

Alphaviruses

During this reporting period, there were 5,134 alphavirus notifications (BFV and RRV) reported in Australia, which was a moderate season when compared with other seasons since 1995–96 (mean: 4,933, range: 612–8,422 notifications). The highest alphavirus season on record was observed in 1995–96. During 2005–06, Australia experienced the second highest alphavirus season on record with 7,552 notifications.

During 2006–07, RRV infections accounted for 55% (n=3,369) of notifications (Figure 1), which as a proportion of total mosquito-borne disease activity is moderately low when compared to previous seasons (range: 47–73%). The number and proportion of BFV notifications (n=1,765, 29%) were the second highest on record since 1998–99 and the BFV notification activity for 2006–07 was 1.4 times the five-year mean.

Figure 1. Notifications of select mosquito-borne diseases, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by season of onset

Figure 1. Notifications of select mosquito-borne diseases, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by season of onset

The crude annual BFV notification rate in 2006–07 of 8.6 cases per 100,000 population was the second highest notification rate since reliable reporting of this disease commenced in 1991 (Figure 2). The crude annual RRV notification rate was moderately low in 2006–07 (16.4 cases per 100,000 population) when compared to 2005–06 and other seasons in which there was significantly higher epidemic activity (1991–93, 1995–97, 1998–00, 2003–04).

Figure 2. Crude annual notification rates for Barmah Forest virus and Ross River virus, Australia, 1 July 1991 to 30 June 2007, by season of diagnosis

Figure 2. Crude annual notification rates for Barmah Forest virus and Ross River virus, Australia, 1 July 1991 to 30 June 2007, by season of diagnosis

Top of page

Barmah Forest virus infections

Figure 3 shows the epidemic curves of BFV notifications by month and season since 2002–03 with a rolling mean of BFV activity for the same month over five years. During 2006–07, there were 1,765 BFV notifications, the majority of which were reported by Queensland (n=875, 50%) and New South Wales (n=590, 33%). The peak number of notifications was observed in April 2007 (n=245) and was smaller than the previous peak month in 2003 and 2006. The most striking feature of the BFV season in 2006–07 was the unusually high and significant notification activity occurring outside of the peak seasonal months, with notifications exceeding two standard deviations above the five year monthly rolling mean from July to October 2006. New South Wales, the Northern Territory, Queensland, and South Australia notified the majority of activity from June to October 2006, with between 25%–47% of their jurisdictional total for the season reported during this quarter. One explanation is that the laboratory-based notifications diagnosed from July to September 2006 may be the result of late onset or late presentations from possible exposure during the epidemic peak months in February–May 2006. Another possible explanation may be that climatic conditions were favourable for earlier than usual breeding of vectors leading to an earlier period for transmission.

During 2006–07, all jurisdictions except Tasmania and Victoria reported BFV activity above the five-year mean (Figure 4). The Northern Territory and South Australia notified more than two times the five-year mean and notifications from these jurisdictions have been increasing since the 2004–05 season (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Epidemic curves of Barmah Forest virus infection notifications, Australia, 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2007, by month and season of diagnosis

Figure 3. Epidemic curves of Barmah Forest virus infection notifications, Australia, 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2007, by month and season of diagnosis

Figure 4. Ratio of Barmah Forest virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory*

Figure 4. Ratio of Barmah Forest virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

* Note: Tasmania not shown with only one Barmah Forest virus infections notification in 2005–06.

Table 1 and Map 1 show that the highest rates of BFV notifications in Statistical Divisions during 2006–07 were reported from the Northern Territory (74.4 per 100,000 population), which excludes Darwin, Palmerston and Darwin rural areas (as there are only two Statistical Divisions in the Northern Territory). There is a higher rate of alphavirus notification in the Darwin rural area when compared with Darwin, with Palmerston having an intermediate rate (Peter Whelan, personal communication).

Moderately high rates of BFV notification in Australia were reported from the Central West and Northern Statistical Divisions in Queensland, and the Mid-North Coast Statistical Division in New South Wales. The second highest BFV notification rate in New South Wales (45.9 notifications per 100,000 population) was reported in the South Eastern Statistical Division, and this was linked to the largest documented outbreak of BFV along the South Coast, particularly the Eurobodalla region, which peaked in April 2007.23

Table 1. Highest notification rates of Barmah Forest virus infection in select jurisdictions, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by Statistical Division of residence

Notifying jurisdiction
Statistical Division
Rate (per 100,000) Notifications (n) ABS population estimate
Northern Territory Northern Territory*
74.4
69
92,733
Queensland Central West
57.6
7
12,155
New South Wales Mid-North Coast
51.1
152
297,409
Queensland Northern
48.4
102
210,943
New South Wales South Eastern
45.9
94
204,854
Queensland Fitzroy
42.4
82
193,182
Queensland Far North
37.7
92
243,948
Northern Territory Darwin
34.2
39
113,955
New South Wales Richmond-Tweed
33.8
77
227,815
South Australia Murray Lands
31.9
22
69,066
Victoria East Gippsland
13.1
11
84,222

* Excludes Darwin, Palmerston and Darwin rural area.

Map 1. Notifications and notification rates of Barmah Forest virus infection, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 07, by Statistical Division of residence

Map 1. Notifications and notification rates of Barmah Forest virus infection, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 07, by Statistical Division of residence

Top of page

The national notification rate of BFV was highest in the 55–59 year age group (Figure 5). The highest notification rates in males were in the 55–59 year age group (16.5 cases per 100,000 population) and females in the 40–44 year age group (14.8 cases per 100,000 population).

Figure 5. Notification rate for Barmah Forest virus infections, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Figure 5. Notification rate for Barmah Forest virus infections, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

With the exception of the 60–79 year age group, the age-specific rates of BFV notifications in 2006–07 decreased slightly when compared to 2005–06 (Figure 6). The BFV age-specific notification rates for all age groups in 2006–07 were still above the five-year mean.

Figure 6. Trends in Barmah Forest virus infection notification rates, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by age group

Figure 6. Trends in Barmah Forest virus infection notification rates, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by age group

Ross River virus infections

During 2006–07, Australia experienced a moderately low RRV season (n=3,369) when compared to the previous five seasons (mean=3,395), similar to the low activity observed during the 2004–05 season. The majority of RRV notifications during 2006–07 were reported by Queensland (n=1,753, 52%), New South Wales (n=674, 20%) and Western Australia (n=397, 12%).

The monthly notifications of RRV were above the five-year monthly rolling mean at the start of the season in October and November 2006, but the numbers of notifications dropped well below the five-year monthly mean from December 2006 to April 2007 (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Epidemic curves of Ross River virus infection notifications, Australia, 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2007, by month and season of diagnosis

Figure 7. Epidemic curves of Ross River virus infection notifications, Australia, 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2007, by month and season of diagnosis

In contrast to last season, only four jurisdictions (the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, the Northern Territory and South Australia) reported RRV activity above the five-year mean for their jurisdiction (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Ratio of Ross River virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Figure 8. Ratio of Ross River virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Top of page

Table 2 and Map 2 show that the highest rates of RRV notifications in Australia during 2006–07 were reported from the Kimberley region of Western Australia (242.6 notifications per 100,000 population), the Northern Territory (170.4 notifications per 100,000 population) and the Central West Statistical Division in Queensland (156.3 notifications per 100,000 population). Moderately high rates of RRV notification were reported in the Mackay, Far North and North West Statistical Divisions in Queensland, and the Wide Bay Burnett, North Western and Mid-North Coast Statistical Divisions in New South Wales.

Table 2. Highest notification rates of Ross River virus infection in select jurisdictions, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by Statistical Division of residence

Notifying jurisdiction
Statistical Division
Rate (per 100,000) Notifications (n) ABS population estimate
Western Australia Kimberley
242.6
87
35,865
Queensland South West
191.9
52
27,095
Northern Territory Northern Territory*
170.4
158
92,733
Queensland Central West
156.3
19
12,155
Queensland Northern
147.9
312
210,943
Queensland Fitzroy
102.0
197
193,182
Northern Territory Darwin
92.1
105
113,955
Queensland Mackay
71.9
109
151,572
Queensland North West
66.6
23
34,558
New South Wales North Western
63.7
76
119,276
Queensland Far North
57.8
141
243,948
New South Wales Mid-North Coast
55.5
165
297,409
Queensland Wide Bay-Burnett
44.7
118
264,201
South Australia Murray Lands
40.5
28
69,066
Victoria Mallee
22.5
21
93,415

* Excludes Darwin, Palmerston and Darwin rural area.

Map 2. Notifications and notification rates of Ross River virus infections, Australia, 2006–07, by Statistical Division of residence

Map 2. Notifications and notification rates of Ross River virus infections, Australia, 2006–07, by Statistical Division of residence

The rate of national notifications for RRV was highest in the 40–44 year age group (Figure 9). Females in the 35–39 year age group (28.6 cases per 100,000 population) and males in 40–44 year age group (28.6 cases per 100,000 population) had the highest national age– and sex-specific notification rates.

Figure 9. Notification rate for Ross River virus infections, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Figure 9. Notification rate for Ross River virus infections, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

The age-specific notification rates for RRV were lower for all age groups when compared to last season. The overall pattern of the susceptible age groups has not changed, with the 20–39 and 40–59 age groups recording the highest age-specific notification rates (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Trends in Ross River virus infections notification rates, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by age group

Figure 10. Trends in Ross River virus infections notification rates, Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by age group

Top of page

Chikungunya virus infections

In January and March 2005 there was a large epidemic of chikungunya virus infection on Comoros and Reunion Island, in the south-west Indian Ocean. Chikungunya virus subsequently spread to Mauritius, the Seychelles and Madagascar in 2006. Epidemics were also reported in India during 2005–2007 with well over a million cases from 13 states. The largest outbreaks were reported from Kerala state. Epidemic activity also occurred in Sri Lanka and the Maldives in 2006. At the time of writing there have been several large outbreaks reported from Indonesia and Malaysia.

The Northern Territory reported the first known imported cases of chikungunya virus infection (n=2) in 2004 (Peter Markey, personal communication), one of which was reported in a 30-year-old woman who most probably acquired the infection in East Timor.24 Table 3 shows that there have been at least 32 cases of imported chikungunya infections diagnosed in Australia since 2006, with the majority detected by PathWest Laboratory Medicine, (Western Australia) (n=14); the Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, and Westmead Hospital, (New South Wales) (n=7); and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory.25 The majority of chikungunya virus infections were acquired in Sri Lanka (n=10), India (n=7) and Mauritius (n=6). There were no reports of cases imported from Indonesia during 2006–2007.

The National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee has recently developed a provisional national case definition for chikungunya virus infection (Appendix), which is pending endorsement from the Communicable Diseases Network Australia and Public Health Laboratory Network. It is important to note that at the time of writing, chikungunya is not nationally notifiable but is notifiable in New South Wales and the Northern Territory under the disease category arbovirus not elsewhere classified. The provisional case definition attempts to distinguish past and recent chikungunya infections from endemic Australian alphaviruses such as Barmah Forest virus and Ross River virus. As chikungunya is most closely related to the o’nyong-nyong virus and is a member of the Semliki Forest antigenic complex,26 it is important to be aware of false-positive reactions with other arboviruses, particularly when travellers may be arriving from countries with endemic alphaviruses.

Table 3. Number of imported chikungunya cases to Australia (n=30), 2006–2007, by state or territory

Notifying jurisdiction
Cases
Year of diagnosis
Laboratory tests
Source
Country of acquisition
Western Australia
14
2006 (n=9)
2007 (n=5)
High HI, IgM pos (9), high rise HI, IgM pos (3), IgM only (2) David Smith, PathWest Laboratory India (4), Mauritius (3), Sri Lanka (2), China (1), overseas (2), unknown (2)
Victoria
8
2006 (n=5), 2007 (n=3) PCR, then sequencing Johnson et al,25 Druce et al,27 Liu et al,28 James Fielding DHS Sri Lanka (6), Mauritius (1), India (1)
New South Wales
7
2006 (n=4)
2007 (n=3)
Culture negative, negative for BFV, RRV, DENV, flavivirus by ELISA and neutralisation, IgM pos for chikungunya by IFA, high neutralisation titres and clinical histories Linda Hueston, ICPMR Mauritis (2) Seychelles (2) India (1) Sri Lanka (2)
Northern Territory
1
2007 (n=1) 2007 case dengue negative, flavivirus and chikungunya positive Peter Markey, NT CDC DHCS India (1)

Top of page

Flaviviruses

Table 4 shows human notifications of flavivirus infections from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory. There were 276 notifications of human flavivirus infection during 2006–07, the majority of which were locally acquired and imported DENV notifications.

The Sentinel Chicken Programme is a surveillance network involving New South Wales, the Northern Territory, Victoria and Western Australia, and is designed to detect flavivirus activity (including the endemic arboviruses MVEV and KUNV).29

Table 4. Number of flavivirus notifications, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, Australia, by state or territory

State or territory
Notifications
DENV Flavi NEC KUNV MVEV
ACT
2
0
0
0
NSW
72
0
0
0
NT
15
0
0
0
Qld
113
22
0
0
SA
12
0
0
0
Tas
0
0
0
0
Vic
8
3
0
0
WA
28
1
0
0
Australia
250
26
0
0

Top of page

Northern Territory

The Northern Territory sentinel chicken program commenced in January 1992 and replaced an earlier program run by the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS). Sentinel chicken flocks in the Northern Territory are maintained, bled and analysed for flavivirus infection in a combined program between the Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services, the Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines (DPIFM), and volunteers.

Sentinel chicken flocks are presently at Darwin urban (Leanyer), Darwin rural (Howard Springs), Beatrice Hill (Coastal Plains Research Station), Kakadu (Jabiru), Katherine, Nhulunbuy, Tennant Creek, Alyangula, Nathan River and Alice Springs (Ilparpa and Arid Zone Research Station).

DPIFM officers or volunteers usually bleed flocks once a month and the samples are sent to the DPIFM for specific testing for MVEV and KUNV. Sometimes for operational reasons, chickens are not bled during a schedule month and hence seroconversion shown in the next bleed could have occurred in the previous month. When chickens from a flock show new antibodies to MVEV during a prime risk period, a media warning is issued for the region for the risk period. These warnings advise the public of the need to take added precautions to avoid mosquito bites. Chickens are replaced at least annually and more frequently if birds die or if a large proportion seroconvert. They are well positioned to detect flavivirus activity near the principal towns of the Northern Territory and hence provide timely and accurate indication of risk to people in those towns.

In the 2006–07 season, MVEV activity was detected in Howard Springs in November, Adelaide River in June, Nhulunbuy in October and February, Katherine in February and May, Tennant Creek in April and Nathan River in May. The MVEV total seroconversions this season (n=11) was slightly less compared to last season (n=15), with most seroconversions this reporting period (n=3) occurring in Katherine and Nathan River, followed by the Nhulunbuy flock (n=2). Most seroconversion this season occurred in May (n=4), which is the month when the long-term seroconversion peak occurs, followed by February (n=3).

There were no seroconversions in the two Alice Springs flocks, most probably due to low seasonal vector numbers. In addition, the successful effluent swamp drainage and better effluent management from nearby sewage facilities in the Ilparpa area, have led to an overall reduction in vector numbers near the Alice Springs outskirts during summer. There were also no seroconversions in the Leanyer and the Alyangula flock. However, the Alyangula flock was last bled in February 2007, due to operational issues.

No human cases of MVEV disease were reported in the Northern Territory in 2006–07 and the last reported case was in March 2005, when a 3-year-old boy from a community in Arnhem Land had a relatively mild illness and made a complete recovery.

Kunjin virus activity was present throughout the Northern Territory, with seroconversions to KUNV in Darwin (Howard Springs) in June; Darwin (Leanyer) in April, May and June, Adelaide River in June; Nhulunbuy in October; Katherine in August, February, March and May; Tennant Creek in April; Jabiru in May and June; and Nathan River in August. The virus activity from July to October is probably a result of activity extending from the last arbovirus season rather than an indication of early activity this season. There has been a trend over the last 10 years to increasing numbers of seroconversions to KUNV, with this season’s total (n=24) nearly double the number from last season (n=13) and the highest since the program started in 1992. Most seroconversions occurred in the Leanyer (n=6), Katherine (n=6) and Jabiru (n=5) flocks. Seroconversions mostly occurred this season in May (n=9) and June (n=6), while the long term peak is also in May in the Northern Territory. The high number of seroconversions to KUNV was most likely due to significant late wet season rain in the Top End, leading to an extended period of relatively high Culex vector numbers.

The Northern Territory did not report any human cases of KUNV infection this season. The last reported KUNV case from the Northern Territory was in a 23-year-old female from Alice Springs in May 2001.

Top of page

Western Australia

Sentinel chicken flocks in Western Australia are maintained, bled and analysed for specific antibodies to MVEV and KUNV in a combined program between The University of Western Australia, the Western Australian Department of Health (WA DOH), local governments and community volunteers. Twenty-eight sentinel chicken flocks are located at major towns and communities in the Kimberley, Pilbara, Gascoyne, Goldfields, Midwest and Central Coastal regions of Western Australia. Environmental health officers or trained volunteers take blood samples from the chickens each fortnight from December to June (the major MVEV ‘risk’ season) and monthly at other times. Samples are tested by the Arbovirus Surveillance and Research Laboratory at The University of Western Australia.30 Sometimes for operational reasons, chickens are not bled fortnightly and a seroconversion detected in the next bleed may have occurred earlier.

With the exception of August, rainfall was generally above average and temperatures were usually average to above average in northern Western Australia between July and December 2006. Seasonal monsoonal rains occurred in January. The monsoonal period quietened in February before becoming active again in March and April, and a series of tropical cyclones also caused heavy widespread rainfall and flooding in the Kimberley, Pilbara and Gascoyne regions. Heavy rainfall in north-eastern parts of the Kimberley region continued into the late wet season in May and June.

A total of 3,405 serum samples from the 27 flocks located in Western Australia were screened for antibodies to flaviviruses during 2006–07. Seroconversions to flaviviruses were detected in 68 (2.0%) of the samples. Thirty-six seroconversions detected between July and September 2006 were associated with a prolonged period of activity extending from the 2005–06 wet season, possibly due to continued rainfall in northern Western Australia in July 2006. The majority of these seroconversions were due to MVEV activity (n=22), and to a lesser degree KUNV activity (n=7).

The first activity associated with the 2006–07 wet season was detected in January when KUNV was simultaneously detected at Kununurra in the north-east Kimberley region and in the Ophthalmia sentinel chicken flock near Newman in the Pilbara region. MVEV activity was first detected in April at Wyndham and Halls Creek in the north-east and south-east Kimberley region, respectively, and in the sentinel chicken flock at Marble Bar in the north-east Pilbara region in June 2007. A total of 32 flavivirus seroconversions were associated with the 2006–07 wet season. Most of these flavivirus seroconversions were due to KUNV activity (56%), whilst MVEV accounted for 25% of the flavivirus seroconversions. Seroconversions continued in Kimberley and Pilbara sentinel chicken flocks beyond June 2007, possibly facilitated by continued late wet season rainfall in northern Western Australia in May and June 2007. No flavivirus activity was detected south of Newman in the Pilbara region in 2006–07. The level of MVEV activity was substantially lower than the previous year, however the level of activity of KUNV in sentinel chickens was greater, particularly in the Kimberley region. Unidentified flavivirus infections were detected at several locations in the Kimberley and Pilbara regions. These are possibly due to activity of other flaviviruses that are occasionally isolated from mosquitoes collected in northern Western Australia.

The WA DOH initially issued health warnings of increased risk of KUNV to residents and visitors to northern Western Australia on 15 February 2007, following seroconversions to KUNV in the east Kimberley and east Pilbara regions. An additional warning was issued on 3 May 2007 advising residents and travellers to the north-east Kimberley region of the increased risk of MVEV after seroconversions to MVEV were detected in sentinel flocks in this region. A third warning was issued on 25 June 2007 following continued detections of MVEV and KUNV in the Kimberley and east Pilbara regions, including the first activity for the season at Marble Bar. No locally-acquired flavivirus human cases were reported from Western Australia during the 2006–07 season.

Top of page

New South Wales

Samples from four sentinel chicken sites were tested weekly for KUNV and MVEV antibodies in New South Wales over a six month period in 2006–07.23 There were no seroconversions to MVEV or KUNV during this period. There were no human cases reported from New South Wales for either MVEV or KUNV. The last reported case of KUNV from New South Wales was notified in May 2001 in a 58-year-old female from Griffith. There have been no recorded cases of MVEV to date in NNDSS from New South Wales.

Victoria

Samples from sentinel chicken flocks located throughout northern inland Victoria (10 sites along the Murray River, Map 3) were tested weekly for flavivirus antibodies from 6 November 2006 to early March 2007. No KUNV or MVEV activity was detected in any of the samples. There were no human cases of KUNV or MVEV reported from Victoria during 2006–07. The last reported case of KUNV infection in Victoria was in October 2004. There have been no recorded cases of MVEV in NNDSS from Victoria.

Map 3. Sentinel chicken testing sites, Australia 2006–07

Map 3. Sentinel chicken testing sites, Australia 2006–07

Queensland

There were no sentinel chicken flocks in Queensland during 2006–07 although flocks were maintained in 2002–03. There were no cases of KUNV or MVEV reported by Queensland during 2006–07. The last reported cases of KUNV from Queensland were three sporadic cases notified in July 2004, December 2004, and February 2005. The last reported MVEV case from Queensland was in a 3-year-old boy from Mount Isa in 2001.

Japanese encephalitis virus infections

Japanese encephalitis virus appears nearly annually in the Torres Strait in far northern Queensland and surveillance has involved the use of sentinel pigs that develop detectable viraemia and antibody titres to JEV.

AQIS, through its Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy program, conducted monitoring for JEV for the 2007 wet season using sentinel pigs at Injinoo airport, Northern Peninsula Area, Cape York. The five sentinel pigs did not seroconvert and there was no evidence of transmission of JEV to the mainland in 2007 (based on results of testing at Queensland Health Scientific Services and the CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory).

There were no human cases of JEV in Australia during 2006–07. The last reported JEV case was in February 2004, when Queensland Health notified that a 66-year-old male acquired JEV from Papua New Guinea. There have been nine other cases of JEV reported to NNDSS since 1995, although JEV was not nationally notifiable until 2001. Four of these notifications were reported in Torres Strait Islanders from the Badu Island community, two of which were fatal (1995). Another locally-acquired JEV case was reported in a resident from the mouth of the Mitchell River, Cape York Peninsula, Queensland in 1998. The remaining four cases were reported as acquired from overseas countries.

Flavivirus infections (not elsewhere classified)

There were 26 flavivirus (not elsewhere classified or NEC) notifications during the 2006–07 season, the majority of which were reported by Queensland. Of the 26 flavivirus NEC notifications, five were due to Kokobera infection with the virus unidentified for the remaining 21 notifications. The importation status was reported in four notifications with two acquired in Australia, and one each from Uruguay and Indonesia. The country of acquisition was not reported for the remaining 22 notifications.

Top of page

Dengue virus infections

There were 250 notifications of DENV infections during the 2006–07 season. Table 5 shows that the cases were mainly from Queensland (n=113, 45%), New South Wales (n=72, 29%) and Western Australia (n=28, 11%).

Table 5. Number of dengue notifications, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Notifying jurisdiction
n % of total
ACT
2
1
NSW
72
29
NT
15
6
Qld
113
45
SA
12
5
Tas.
0
0
Vic.
8
3
WA
28
11
Total
250
100

Notifications from New South Wales, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia exceeded the five-year mean in each jurisdiction (Figure 11), reflecting an increase in imported cases of dengue virus from overseas countries or from Queensland.

Figure 11. Ratio of dengue virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Figure 11. Ratio of dengue virus infection notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Queensland reported that of the 113 DENV notifications, only 39 were acquired locally. Figure 12 shows that the local outbreak of DENV this season began in February and peaked in April 2007. The notifications were reported in residents mainly from the Townsville area. One resident of Brisbane acquired the infection in Townsville (Christine Selvey, personal communication.) The DENV serotype for this outbreak was Type 3 in 67% of notifications (n=26 of 39) and the serotype was not typed in the remaining 13 cases.

Figure 12. Epidemic curve of locally-acquired dengue notifications (n=39), 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by month of diagnosis and residential location

Figure 12. Epidemic curve of locally-acquired dengue notifications (n=39), 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by month of diagnosis and residential location

For DENV notifications which were acquired overseas (Table 6), the country of acquisition was reported to NNDSS in 20% of notifications (n=42 of 211). Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand were the most frequently reported country in which DENV infection was acquired. The most commonly reported dengue serotype acquired overseas was Type 1 (n=25), Type 2 and 3 (n=16 each). The dengue serotype was not supplied in 72% of the overseas-acquired dengue notifications (n=152 of 211).

Table 6. Dengue notifications, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by serotype and country of acquisition

Country of acquisition
Total Serotype
Not typed Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
Country unknown
169
138
14
8
8
1
Australia
39
13
0
0
26
0
Indonesia
7
4
1
1
0
1
Philippines
6
1
1
1
3
0
Thailand
6
1
0
3
2
0
Cook Islands
4
0
4
0
0
0
India
3
2
0
1
0
0
Papua New Guinea
3
2
0
1
0
0
Fiji
2
0
2
0
0
0
Samoa
2
2
0
0
0
0
Sri Lanka
2
1
1
0
0
0
Bangladesh
1
0
0
1
0
0
Cambodia
1
0
0
0
1
0
Mexico
1
0
1
0
0
0
Pakistan
1
0
0
0
1
0
Singapore
1
1
0
0
0
0
South America
1
0
0
0
1
0
Vietnam
1
0
1
0
0
0
Total
250
165
25
16
42
2

Figure 13 shows that imported DENV notifications in Australia were most frequently reported across the 20–49 year age groups (n=136, 64%) whereas in locally acquired cases from Queensland, notifications were scattered across age groups with a significant peak in the 50–54 year age group (n=8, 10%), which were mostly male (n=7).

Figure 13. Dengue notifications, locally acquired and imported cases, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Figure 13a. Dengue notifications, imported cases, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex Figure 13b. Dengue notifications, locally acquired cases, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Top of page

Malaria

There were 640 notifications of overseas-acquired malaria in Australia in the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007 with no reports of locally-acquired malaria. The majority of malaria notifications were reported by Queensland (28%, n=177, Table 7), Victoria (20%, n=177), New South Wales (19%, n=119) and Western Australia (17%, n=107). The number of malaria notifications reported from Victoria and Western Australia exceeded two standard deviations above their five-year average (Figure 14).

Table 7. Malaria notifications in Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by parasite type

Parasite type
Type
%
ACT NSW NT Qld SA Tas Vic WA Australia
Plasmodium falciparum
47
2
48
36
77
21
13
40
63
300
Plasmodium vivax
40
5
56
14
87
6
5
69
11
253
Other Plasmodium spp
6
1
9
0
10
1
0
9
8
38
Mixed Plasmodium spp
3
0
1
0
3
2
0
9
3
18
Plasmodium species not typed
5
0
5
1
0
2
1
0
22
31
Total
100
8
119
51
177
32
19
127
107
640

Figure 14. Ratio of malaria notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

Figure 14. Ratio of malaria notifications to mean of previous five years, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by state or territory

* Above two standard deviations.

Figure 15 shows that the 2006–07 reporting period was the third largest for malaria notifications since 2001–02.

Figure 15. Number of notifications of malaria, Australia, 2000 to 2006, by year of onset

Figure 15. Number of notifications of malaria, Australia, 2000 to 2006, by year of onset

Overall, malaria notifications were highest in the young adult 20–24 year age group (Figure 16). This trend was also observed in 2005–06 and in years prior to 2004–05 (Figure 17).

Figure 16. Number of imported malaria notifications, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Figure 16. Number of imported malaria notifications, Australia, 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, by age group and sex

Figure 17. Trends in the age distribution of malaria notifications, Australia, 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2006, by age group

Figure 17. Trends in the age distribution of malaria notifications, Australia, 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2006, by age group

Figure 17 shows that since 2000–01 there has been a steady increase in the proportion of children under the age of 15 years notified with malaria, starting at 7% in 2000–01 and peaking in 2004–05 at over 30% (n=260). In 2006–07 the proportion of notifications in children aged under 15 years has dropped slightly to 25% but this proportion remains the second highest for this age group over the past seven years. This trend in malaria notifications from young children has been discussed elsewhere and is related to refugee arrivals.29

The infecting Plasmodium species were reported for 95% of malaria notifications in 2006–07 (Table 8). The majority of the 640 malaria notifications were due to P. falciparum (47%, n=300) and P. vivax (40%, n=253) while other Plasmodium species and mixed Plasmodium species infections accounted for 6% and 3% respectively.

Table 8. Malaria notifications in Australia, 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2007, by parasite type

Infecting species
Year of diagnosis Last 5 year mean Ratio 06/07 5 year mean
2001–02 2002–03 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07
Plasmodium falciparum
175
191
174
410
316
300
253.2
1.2
Plasmodium vivax
365
286
249
239
309
253
289.6
0.9
Other Plasmodium spp
25
19
21
34
22
38
24.2
1.6
Mixed Plasmodium spp
6
12
19
27
41
18
21.0
0.9
Plasmodium species not typed
9
8
2
19
14
31
10.4
3.0
Total
580
516
465
729
702
640

Figure 18 shows that in 2006–07 the proportion of notifications due to P. falciparum malaria (47%) increased slightly from last year (45%) and the number of P. falciparum malaria notifications was up 1.4 times from the five-year mean for the same species.

Figure 18. Trends in malaria notifications, by infecting species and year of onset

Figure 18. Trends in malaria notifications, by infecting species and year of onset

Top of page

Acknowledgements

The National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee members are (in alphabetical order): Bart Currie, Peter Daniels, Julie Hall, Rogan Lee, Mike Lindsay, Conan Liu, John Mackenzie, Rodney Moran, Scott Ritchie, Richard Russell, Christine Selvey, David Smith, Greg Smith, James Walker, Peter Whelan, Craig Williams, with Susan Barker and Phil Wright from the Secretariat.

We would also like to thank:

Alison Milton and Stefan Stirzaker, Office of Health Protection, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

State and territory public health communicable disease surveillance managers

Sentinel reports were provided by:

Cheryl Johansen and technical staff in the Arbovirus Surveillance and Research Laboratory and the Mosquito-Borne Disease Control Branch, Western Australian Department of Health

The New South Wales Arbovirus Surveillance and Mosquito Monitoring Program, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital

Peter Whelan, Nina Kurucz, Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services and Lorna Melville, Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines

Elizabeth Birbilis and Joe Azuolas, Victorian Department of Human Services and Victorian Department of Primary Industries

James Walker, Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy, AQIS, and Scott Ritchie, Tropical Public Health Unit Network – Cairns, Queensland Health

Top of page

Author details

Conan Liu1

Kylie Begg1

Cheryl Johansen2

Peter Whelan3

Nina Kurucz3

Lorna Melville4

1. Surveillance Policy and Systems Section, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory

2. Arbovirus Surveillance and Research Laboratory, Discipline of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia

3. Medical Entomology, Communicable Disease Control, Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services, Northern Territory

4. Virology, Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines, Northern Territory

Corresponding author: Mr Conan Liu, Surveillance Policy and Systems, Office of Health Protection, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, GPO Box 4898, MDP 14, CANBERRA ACT 2601. Telephone: +61 2 6289 2712. Facsimile: +61 2 6289 7791. Email: conan.liuAThealth.gov.au

Top of page

References

1. Russell RC. Ross River virus: ecology and distribution. Annu Rev Entomol 2002;47:1–31.

2. Russell RC, Dwyer DE. Arboviruses associated with human disease in Australia. Microbes Infect 2000;2:1693–1704.

3. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Hills SL, Pyke AT, Montgomery BL, Richards AR, et al. Dengue in north Queensland, 2002. Commun Dis Intell 2003;27:384–389.

4. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Merritt AD, van den Hurk AF, Phillips DA, Serafin IL, et al. Two contiguous outbreaks of dengue type 2 in north Queensland. Med J Aust 1998;168:221–225.

5. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Phillips DA, Serafin IL, Hills SL, van den Hurk AF, et al. An epidemic of dengue 3 in Far North Queensland, 1997–1999. Med J Aust 2001;174:178–182.

6. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Richards AR, Taylor CT, Pyke AT, Montgomery BL, et al. Multiple outbreaks of dengue serotype 2 in north Queensland, 2003/04. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006;30:220–225.

7. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Phillips DA, Lee JM, Hills SL, van den Hurk AF, et al. Japanese encephalitis in north Queensland, Australia, 1998. Med J Aust 1999;170:533–536.

8. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Phillips DA, Shield J, Bailey MC, Mackenzie JS, et al. An outbreak of Japanese encephalitis in the Torres Strait, Australia, 1995. Med J Aust 1996;165:256–260.

9. Mackenzie JS. Emerging zoonotic encephalitis viruses: lessons from Southeast Asia and Oceania. J Neurovirol 2005;11:434–440.

10. Mackenzie JS, Broom AK, Hall RA, Johansen CA, Lindsay MD, Phillips DA, et al. Arboviruses in the Australian region, 1990 to 1998. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:93–100.

11. Johansen CA, van den Hurk AF, Pyke AT, Zborowski P, Phillips DA, Mackenzie JS, et al. Entomological investigations of an outbreak of Japanese encephalitis virus in the Torres Strait, Australia, in 1998. J Med Entomol 2001;38:581–588.

12. Van Den Hurk AF, Johansen CA, Zborowski P, Phillips DA, Pyke AT, Mackenzie JS, et al. Flaviviruses isolated from mosquitoes collected during the first recorded outbreak of Japanese encephalitis virus on Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001;64:125–130.

13. Brown A, Bolisetty S, Whelan P, Smith D, Wheaton G. Reappearance of human cases due to Murray Valley encephalitis virus and Kunjin virus in Central Australia after an absence of 26 years. Commun Dis Intell 2002;26:39–44.

14. Büchen-Osmond C. Index to Classification and Taxonomy of Viruses Database, version 3, based on the 7th ICTV Report and subsequent up-dates. 2001 onwards. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/index.htm Accessed on June 2005.

15. Bakonyi T, Ivanics E, Erdelyi K, Ursu K, Ferenczi E, Weissenbock H, et al. Lineage 1 and 2 strains of encephalitic West Nile virus, central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:618–623.

16. World Health Organization. Synopsis of the world malaria situation in 1981. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1983;58:197–199.

17. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Eisen DP, Cooper RD, Brookes DL, Montgomery BL. An outbreak of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Far North Queensland, 2002. Med J Aust 2004;180:24–28.

18. Musgrave IA. Malarial outbreak in Queensland. Med J Aust 1987;146:278.

19. Brookes DL, Ritchie SA, van den Hurk AF, Fielding JR, Loewenthal MR. Plasmodium vivax malaria acquired in Far North Queensland. Med J Aust 1997;166:82–83.

20. Jenkin GA, Ritchie SA, Hanna JN, Brown GV. Airport malaria in Cairns. Med J Aust 1997;166:307–308.

21. Merritt A, Ewald D, van den Hurk AF, Stephen Jr S, Langrell J. Malaria acquired in the Torres Strait. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:1–2.

22. Stickland JF, Roberts AN, Williams V. Transfusion-induced malaria in Victoria. Med J Aust 1992;157:499–500.

23. Doggett S, Clancy J, Haniotis J, Russell RC, Hueston L, Marchetti M, et al. The New South Wales Arbovirus Surveillance and Mosquito Monitoring Program Annual Report 2006–2007: Department of Medical Entomology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital; 2007.

24. Whelan P, Spencer E, Currie B. An imported case of chikungunya in the Northern Territory and a summary of the ecology of the disease. The Northern Territory Disease Control Bulletin 2004;11:19–22.

25. Johnson DF, Druce JD, Chapman S, Swaminathan A, Wolf J, Richards JS, et al. Chikungunya virus infection in travellers to Australia. Med J Aust 2008;188:41–43.

26. Pialoux G, Gauzere BA, Jaureguiberry S, Strobel M. Chikungunya, an epidemic arbovirus. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:319–327.

27. Druce JD, Johnson DF, Tran T, Richards MJ, Birch CJ. Chikungunya virus infection in traveler to Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:509–510.

28. Liu C, Johansen C, Kurucz N, Whelan PI. Communicable Diseases Network Australia: National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee annual report 2005–06. Commun Dis Intell 2006;30:411-429.

29. Broom AK, Azuolas J, Hueston L, Mackenzie JS, Melville L, Smith DW, et al. Australian encephalitis: Sentinel Chicken Surveillance Programme. Commun Dis Intell 2001;25:157–160.

30. Johansen C, Avery V, Dixon G, Geerlings K, Power S, McFall S, et al. The University of Western Australia Arbovirus Surveillance and Research Laboratory Annual Report: 2006–2007: Discipline of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Western Australia; 2007.

Top of page

Appendix. Provisional case definition for chikungunya virus infection (Communicable Diseases Network Australia and Public Health Laboratory Network endorsement still pending)

Reporting

Only confirmed cases should be notified

Confirmed case

A confirmed case requires either:

Laboratory definitive evidence

OR

Laboratory suggestive evidence AND epidemiological evidence AND clinical evidence.

Laboratory definitive evidence

  1. Isolation of chikungunya virus

OR

  1. Detection of chikungunya virus by nucleic acid testing

Laboratory suggestive evidence

  1. Seroconversion or a significant rise in antibody level or a fourfold or greater rise in titre to chikungunya virus, in the absence of a corresponding change in antibody levels to Ross River virus or Barmah Forest virus

OR

  1. Detection of chikungunya virus-specific IgM,1 in the absence of IgM to Ross River virus or Barmah Forest virus

Epidemiological evidence

  1. A history of travel to a chikungunya affected area2 within the two weeks prior to the onset of illness

Clinical evidence

  1. Arthralgia OR myalgia OR rash

Note

  1. An IgG level should always accompany and IgM as this may help to interpret the significance of a single IgM. If IgM only is detected it is important that a convalescent sample is collected to test for seroconversion.
  2. These may vary but include (at the time of writing) parts of Africa (including South Africa, Uganda, Congo, Nigeria, Ghana, Zimbabwe, Senegal, Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Cameroon, Guinea-Bissau), South East Asia (including Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Timor Leste), islands in the Indian Ocean (La Réunion, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Seychelles) and the Indian-sub-continent (including Pakistan and India).

Related Links

Communicable Diseases Intelligence subscriptions

Sign-up to email updates: Subscribe Now

This issue - Vol 32 No 1, March 2008